A Tale Of Four Platforms. Motivations and Uses of Facebook, ✓ Solved

· Updated on December 8, 2025

Assessing the motivations and utilization patterns of major social media platforms among college students provides valuable insights into their digital behaviors, social interactions, and the implications for mental health and privacy. This paper explores the use of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students by examining existing academic literature, behavioral patterns, ethical considerations, and the potential impacts these platforms have on users.

Introduction

Social media has become a ubiquitous part of college students’ lives, influencing their social interactions, academic activities, identity development, and psychological well-being (Alhabash & Ma, 2017). The rapid proliferation of platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat offers a diverse array of tools and features that serve various motivational functions. Understanding why students are motivated to use these platforms and how they utilize them is crucial for educators, mental health professionals, and policymakers aiming to foster healthier digital environments and support student well-being (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010).

Platforms and User Motivations

Facebook, historically the dominant social networking site, is utilized primarily for maintaining existing relationships, sharing life updates, and engaging in community activities (Kord, 2008). Its diverse functionalities support both social comparison and social bonding motivations, allowing students to stay connected with friends, family, and campus communities (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010). Conversely, Twitter’s real-time, information-centric environment caters to students motivated by news updates, political discussions, and public engagement (Chambers, 2018). Twitter's concise format supports quick information exchange, fostering motivation related to activism and intellectual discourse (Giota & Kleftaras, 2014)."

Instagram emphasizes visual sharing, driven by motivations related to self-expression, social validation, and entertainment (Alhabash & Ma, 2017). Its emphasis on images and videos aligns with behavioral themes surrounding aesthetic representation and personal branding (Luo, 2009). Snapchat, distinguished by ephemeral content, attracts users motivated by privacy concerns, spontaneity, and casual communication (Warfel, 2008). Its temporary nature appeals to students aiming to share moments without the fear of permanent digital footprints, thus influencing their social and emotional behaviors.

Ethical Considerations and Privacy Concerns

Using social media platforms raises numerous ethical issues, including privacy, consent, self-disclosure, and boundaries (Zur, 2019). Privacy concerns are particularly salient among college students who often share personal information without fully considering potential consequences (Warfel, 2008). The ethical dilemma extends to how students and institutions manage confidentiality, especially regarding the interaction between personal and academic or professional identities (Lamont-Mills, Christensen, & Moses, 2018). Educators and mental health providers must navigate these issues carefully, promoting ethical social media use that respects privacy and fosters transparency (Rosen, 2012).

Impacts on Mental Health and Well-being

Extensive engagement with social media platforms can have both positive and negative effects on college students’ mental health. On the positive side, social media facilitates social support, community building, and identity exploration, which are vital during transitional life stages (Alhabash & Ma, 2017). However, excessive or maladaptive use can lead to increased anxiety, depression, and self-esteem issues, driven by social comparison and cyberbullying (O’Leary, Miller, Olive, & Kelly, 2015). The concept of “iDisorder” (Rosen, 2012) encapsulates how technology addiction and constant connectivity can impair mental health, emphasizing the importance of balanced platform engagement.

Behavioral Patterns and Ethical Implications

Behavioral studies reveal that college students often tailor their social media activity based on perceived platform appropriateness, audience, and personal motivations (Jent et al., 2011). For example, students may share more personal content on Snapchat and Instagram while restricting more formal or academic sharing to Facebook. Ethical considerations include the responsibility of users to maintain professionalism, avoid oversharing, and respect others' privacy (Zur et al., 2009). Moreover, the decision to access or share sensitive information on social media raises ethical questions about boundaries and confidentiality, especially in contexts involving counseling or academic settings (Lamont-Mills et al., 2018).

Conclusion

The motivations driving social media use among college students are complex and multifaceted, encompassing desires for social connection, entertainment, self-expression, and information access. Each platform caters to different psychological and social needs, with associated ethical considerations concerning privacy, self-disclosure, and boundary management. While social media offers numerous benefits like community engagement and identity exploration, it also poses risks related to mental health and privacy breaches. Therefore, promoting ethical and balanced use, supported by policies and education, remains essential for maximizing benefits and minimizing harms associated with social media among college students (Zur, 2011).

References

  • Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A Tale of Four Platforms. Motivations and Uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat Among College Students? Journal of Media Psychology, 3(1).
  • Chambers, C. T. (2018). Navigating Your Social Media Presence: Opportunities and Challenges. COMMENTARY, 6(3).
  • Giota, K., & Kleftaras, G. (2014). Opportunities, Risks and Ethical Considerations. Social Media and Counseling, 8(8).
  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
  • Kord, J. I. (2008). Understanding the Facebook generation: A study of the relationship between online social networking, academic and social integration, and intentions to re-enroll (Ph.D.). University of Kansas.
  • Lamont-Mills, A., Christensen, S., & Moses, L. (2018). Confidentiality and Informed Consent in Counselling and Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review. PACFA.
  • O’Leary, P. N., Miller, M. M., Olive, M. L., & Kelly, A. N. (2015). Blurred Lines: Ethical Implications of Social Media for Behavior Analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(1), 45–51.
  • Rosen, L. (2012). iDisorder: Understanding Our Obsession with Technology and Overcoming Its Hold on Us. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Warfel, E. A. (2008). Perceptions of Privacy on Facebook (Order No. 3329413). Rochester Institute of Technology, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
  • Zur, O. (2011). To Accept or Not to Accept? How to Respond When Clients Send ‘Friend Request’ to Their Psychotherapists or Counselors on Social Networking Sites. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 414–419.